Windows


I recently had someone ask me about converting from Outlook Express (I nearly fainted, it’s been so long since someone admitted to using OE in front of me) to something more open source (great way to keep from getting a bunch of spam and viruses), and in my research I found a great couple of articles about converting to Open Source mail packages.

The first deals directly with converting from Outlook Express to either Thunderbird or Evolution (which worked great, they told me) and the next is for those converting from that beast from the land of insufficient light, Microsoft Outlook, Converting All Your MS Outlook PST Files To Maildir Format.

Personally, it’s been over 10 years since I was based on Windows email programs, and that only for work. Here’s to all of us who “survived” all those many years on pine and mutt.

Enjoy,

RossB

It’s been a whole year since the ground-breaking Novell-Microsoft Collaboration Agreement was signed and announced. The one-stop shop for official info is here: http://www.moreinterop.com So far, despite the noise in the press, MANY customers have decided to take advantage of the many benefits that the agreement brings to the table. Here’s a list of all 46 of the customers who are allowing us to mention them publicly. They include some of the largest and most recognizable organizations in the world – Wal-Mart, BMW, Costco, HSBC, Nationwide, Siemens and Southwest Airlines just to name a few…

  • 1blu
  • Abraxas Informatik AG
  • ADIF
  • AFG IT Consulting
  • Arsys
  • Arsys Internet S.L.
  • Baker Hughes
  • BATS Trading Inc.
  • BMW AG
  • State of California, Department of Fish and Game
  • State of California Department of Technology Services
  • Cash Converters International Ltd.
  • CHRISTUS Health
  • The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
  • City of Los Angeles
  • CompuCom Systems Inc.
  • Conductor Tecnologia S.A.
  • Costco Wholesale Corp.
  • Flagstar Bank
  • Fujitsu Services Oy
  • Gordon Food Service
  • Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.
  • hi5 Networks Inc.
  • Host Europe
  • HSBC
  • iLoop Mobile Inc.
  • Leicester City Council
  • Kent County, Mich.
  • Mercury Insurance
  • Nationwide
  • Pioneer Corp.
  • PRISACOM SA
  • Reed Elsevier
  • Riverside County, Calif.
  • Save Mart Supermarkets
  • Siemens Corp.
  • South Carolina Department of Probation, Pardon and Parole Services
  • Southwest Airlines Co.
  • Swiss Post
  • Synovus Financial Corp.
  • TDC Hosting
  • T-Systems Enterprise Services GmbH
  • Wal-Mart
  • Washington State Department of Information Services
  • Westmont College
  • Zabka Polska S.A.
  • Links here, here and here

On top of all these customers, several other developments in the relationship have occurred during the first year. Novell and Microsoft have completed building out and are now doing real engineering work and interoperability testing in the Microsoft and Novell Interoperability Lab in Cambridge, Massachusetts. More info on the lab is in the recent press release. Dell signed on as a partner for the agreement as well, working to help Linux customers with SUSE Linux Enterprise Server.

And most recently, Novell and Microsoft extended the agreement by agreeing to work together to make it easier for all software developers to develop applications for users with disabilities, such as blindness. From the press release:

Microsoft will make available its User Interface Automation (UIA) specification, an advanced accessibility framework that simplifies the development of assistive technology products for people with one or more disabilities, and pledge not to assert any Microsoft patents necessary to implement the specification against anyone, regardless of platform, in the open source and proprietary software communities. In concert, to promote interoperability between leading accessibility frameworks in the market, Novell will develop and deliver an adapter that allows the UIA framework to work well with existing Linux accessibility projects and complement the investments made by IBM Corp. and others. Novell’s work will be open source and will make the UIA framework cross-platform while enabling UIA to interoperate with the Linux Accessibility Toolkit (ATK), which ships with SUSE Linux Enterprise, Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Ubuntu Linux. The UIA solution will ensure interoperability of nonvisual access to the next generation of software applications.

“Microsoft’s commitment to make the specification for UIA freely available to others to implement, coupled with Novell’s plans to develop and deliver an adapter that allows Linux accessibility projects to work well with the UIA framework, are tremendous examples of how industry can come together to tackle interoperability problems for blind persons,” said Dr. Marc Maurer, president of the National Federation of the Blind. “The NFB challenges the entire IT industry to continue to look for creative opportunities such as this to solve longstanding interoperability challenges and reduce development barriers to accessibility.”

Interesting:

Virtual Machine Additions for Linux are designed to improve the usability and interoperability of running qualified Linux operating systems as guests or virtual machines of Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1.

Now with support for SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10
Microsoft is committed to testing and supporting many third-party operating systems for use as guest operating systems on Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 virtual machines. To help make sure that you have a favorable experience when you run third-party guest operating systems in Virtual Server 2005, Microsoft Product Support Services (PSS) has created a product support model for these third-party guest operating systems. This support model is consistent with the support model that is used for Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1. Product support for the Virtual Machine Additions will be provided through the normal support channels available for Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1.

More here.

Ok, so my title is a little misleading, there’s not any rivalry between the different areas of Novell and SUSE, other than the usual desire to see your business unit succeed just a little more “betterly” than the other units do. It’s all about friendly competition.

What’s Red vs. Green?

What I’m referring to (with Red vs. Green) is the necessary dividing line between the traditional Novell business units like Workgroup (Netware, Open Enterprise Server, Groupwise etc.) which I think of as “Red”, and the newer and Open Source-centric business unit called Open Platform Solutions (SLES, SLED, SLERT, SLEPOS etc.), which I think of as “Green”. (Get it? SUSE Green, like the Gecko?)

I have come up with the analogy and strategy of Red vs. Green as a way of helping partners, customers and the casual passerby understand that depending on which Novell/SUSE products they have, they will likely benefit most from a particular set of products and growth options.

“I See Red”

My experience has been that if a customer is “Red”, they’re almost always firmly ensconced in and using the Novell services throughout the enterprise, with some confusion as to how and why they might make use of Linux. The first order of business is to determine how much they know about Linux in general, and in particular Novell’s use of SUSE Linux Enterprise in it’s product lines. After hundreds of these discussions, we can get everyone on the same page with a little discussion, some Q&A and a handy whiteboard in short order.

How Does This Work?

For example, in a conversation with faux customer Air America, I find they have a long-standing Netware infrastructure for File and Print, do a little clustering for Groupwise and use iPrint for printing with all account management taking place through an Identity management setup and eDirectory. They have Windows workstations that make full use of the Netware Client and it’s services. I’d already lean toward “Red” strategy with them, but they might be toying with the idea of going “over to Linux”, so I go a little further.

The questions I ask them are very simple and straightforward:

  • Do you have any data on NSS volumes?
  • Do you use any of the advanced features of NSS?
  • Do you have Novell Clustering Services or Business Continuity Clustering set up?
  • Do you have a very large number of printers?
  • Do your people have Novell Client software on their computers for access to the network?

A “yes” answer to any of these questions points to the Open Enterprise Server (with Version 2, OES = Linux base, Novell’s standard services converted to run great on Linux layered on top). Novell has spent a lot of time and effort to make it as effortless as possible to have this type of organization migrate up to OES, there is a very complete and clear path for this customer to begin to use Linux-based Novell services with the least disruption possible and often at a considerable cost-savings.

I will try if possible to help them see where “Green” might fit in, either for hosting Groupwise or other services, such as Mono (Dot Net compatible server), Virtualization (Xen) or any of a host of other possibilities. Usually this type of customer will stay “Red” and for good reason.

“It’s Easy Being Green”

On the other side of this equation, I will find customers who don’t have a lick of “Red” in their environment, and these are usually standard UNIX shops on the server side, usually either a Solaris or AIX flavor, some HP-UX, but they’ll be using mostly Windows on the client side. Usually if they say “No” to my “Got any Novell products or Netware around?”, they will go “Green” easily.

The discussion with this client is much easier, they’re a classic “Green” customer, all the services and tools they are used to using have an analog (equivalent) in the SUSE Linux Enterprise Server/Desktop product line. Once I determine they have no Netware products in the organization, we don’t even talk about “Red vs. Green”, it’s not relevant, they can even run eDirectory and Zenworks Linux Management on SLES, no “Red” needed.

I additionally will probe to see if they have any Terminal Server or Citrix/Ericom deployed for application security and updateability, if they do, it makes the Linux Desktop play much more likely, especially if they make use of TS/Citrix as a desktop solution. How compelling is $50 or less a seat for the presentation OS on the desktop versus $239 or so for the oddly-shaped box o’ Vista?

Got any changes or suggestions to this whole Red vs. Green thing? I’m constantly getting feedback and changing it, let me know and I’ll credit you and update it.

Enjoy,

RossB

What is DOS? I don’t know; I’ve never used it before… until today!

Recently I’ve been working on getting SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop working on a really really old piece of hardware. As one of the troubleshooting steps I had to update the BIOS to the latest version. In order to do this the vendor told me that I had to boot into DOS and run an executable that would update the BIOS.

As I said, I’ve never used DOS before, so I had to reach out to Peter Bowen for help. Here are the steps he walked me through to create a Virtual FreeDOS Floppy disk image on your hard drive that you can boot from.

Make sure the following are installed: dosbootdisk, syslinux. Dosbootdisk is a program that lets you create a FreeDOS boot disk. Syslinux is a boot loader for Linux which operates off an MS-DOS or Windows FAT file system.

Follow these steps to boot into a DOS partition:

  • zcat /usr/share/dosbootdisk/floppy.gz /boot/floppy.img
  • mount -o loop /boot/floppy.img /mnt
  • Copy the appropriate files needed for updating the BIOS into /mnt(remember this is DOS so make sure that the file names are no larger than 8 characters and the file extension is no more than 3 characters
  • I had to remove the the following line from my config.sys file in order for the system to boot DOS=UMB,HIGH
  • umount /mnt (remember that you can’t unmount if have have if it is your current working directory ie. if you have cd’ed into it)
  • cp /usr/share/syslinux/memdisk /boot
  • Next we need to setup Grub so that you can boot into your virtual floppy disk.
  • Edit /boot/grub/menu.lst so that it looks something like this:
  • ###DOS Floppy###
    title DOS
    root (hd0,0) #you may need to change this depending on what partition /boot is installed on. Because this system is so old it requires that /boot have it's own partition that is the first partition.

    kernel /memdisk
    initrd /floppy.img

    At this point you should be able to reboot your machine, choose the DOS option and flash your BIOS.

According to a Silicon.com article… Speaking to an audience at the Gartner Symposium/IT Expo last week, Dell’s CEO Michael Dell said that Linux server sales are increasing faster than Windows server sales. You can view the webcast of the keynote here. I think that helps to validate what many of us have intuitively known for years… that Linux is the fastest growing operating system in the IT market. It’s also worth pointing out that Dell is validating the observation we’ve had for some time that more and more organizations are “trusting” Linux A LOT more and deciding to put more “critical applications” on Linux than in the past.

He said: “On the server side Linux continues to grow nicely, a bit faster than Windows. We’re seeing a move to Linux in critical applications, and Linux migration has not slowed down.”

However, for those customers who might be concerned about whether Microsoft’s claims of patent violation could result in legal action, Dell added that there were “certainly mechanisms if customers are concerned about patents”.

One of those mechanisms he’s referring to is Novell’s own Novell Technology Assurance Program (NTAP). Whether or not you believe MS’s position on IP, there are surely CxO’s within your organization who prefer to minimize all risks for the organization. NTAP can certainly help give those CxO’s the piece-of-mind necessary, and help remove roadblocks for you to dramatically increase the amount of Linux in your shop — (assuming you like secure, reliable, and low cost operating systems… like SLE) :-)

Find the Silicon.com article here and checkout Michael Dell’s keynote here (Linux comments ~29:30).

Many small businesses and the IT consultants who support them have deployed Linux in some way — hey, it can save a ton of cash! But typically Linux is doing a specific task — maybe a file/print server, web server, firewall, database, etc. The solutions have been done fairly piece-wise, and that can lead to a lack of integration – making things a bit more difficult to manage over time. Alternatively, one might have chosen the Microsoft Small Business product – but we all know where that can lead (security problems, constant patching, IT headaches, excessive software costs, etc.). There really hasn’t been a nicely integrated workgroup suite for small business based combining the best of open source and proprietary enterprise software… until now.

Novell Open Workgroup Suite Small Business Edition has arrived. It works with either Windows or Linux desktops and includes “less expensive” (and arguably EASIER-to-LEARN) alternatives to Windows Vista and MS Office 2007. In addition to a nicely integrated installation, it has a ton of value for a very small price. It includes:

  • File/Print sharing and security – Open Enterprise Server for Linux
  • Laptop backup/file collaboration – iFolder
  • Email/Calendaring – GroupWise
  • End-user general purpose desktop – SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop
  • MS Office-compatible office suite – OpenOffice.org, Novell Edition
  • Backup software – Amanda
  • Network faxing – HylaFAX
  • Anti-spam – MailScanner
  • Anti-virus for email – ClamAV
  • Firewall – iptables
  • VPN – OpenVPN
  • Remote control – TightVNC

… and all this stuff runs on Linux!  Yeah, but how does it compare to the Microsoft Small Business Suite? Look here.

All this for a retail cost of $350 for every 5-users!! Want more info? Check these out… product home page, audio podcast, press release, workgroup team blog

From the article:

September 26, 2007 (Computerworld)Novell Inc.‘s Linux business has soared 243% since last November, when the company signed its controversial deal with Microsoft Corp.

“The affect on sales year over year, for Novell’s first three quarters of our fiscal year, which ends Oct. 31 — our Linux business was up 243%,” said Justin Steinman, director of marketing at Novell, who, along with executives from both companies, spoke at a program hosted by the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council.

And, that growth doesn’t seem to be short-lived.

“We’re continuing to see above market growth year [over] year and that clearly has resulted in the 243% Justin alluded to,” said Susan Heystee, general manager of global strategic alliance at Novell.

More here.

I was eating lunch with a partner the other day and he related to me that a colleague of his had reported that a friend of his sister’s fiance’s father’s lawyer’s second half-cousin (or something more confusing) had said that Microsoft would have a version of Microsoft Linux next year, no fooling.

I thought (didn’t say, thought) “Bull” and we discussed the problems and logistics of such a thing happening with the GPL and all the restrictions that occur with such an environment and the likelihood of Microsoft so changing it’s spots as to have this be likely.

It was only later that I suddenly thought about FreeBSD, which Microsoft has a much more close relationship with, historically running large pieces of Hotmail and MSN on that platform.  What would happen if Microsoft were to come clean about Vista, what a stinker it is and decided to base the next version of Windows on a core of FreeBSD?

Ok, so before you send email flaming me to an absolute crisp, just think of the possibilities.  Who else has been successful with such a pairing of extremely-open licensed underlying OS and a Pretty GUI front-end?  Right, Jobs-san and his happy bunch of coders have been wildly successful with such a setup.

Why not have a branded version of SLED?  See the previous discussion about the GPL, whereas the BSD licenses are basically “Give credit and don’t pretend you wrote what you didn’t” and they can use BSD code in any commercial product they want to.

Makes you think, hmm?

As someone who didn’t really, ahem, “bond” with my statistics classes and content, I really don’t pay as close attention to all the “30% of Windows Users think Linux is a brand of china” proclamations that stream out of the major technology media.  I rely on the number of people who ask my help in the various professional and personal areas of my life, either in picking a good system that’s Linux-ready, how to move their email inboxes to Linux or just how to get those diseased and virus-ridden beasts out of the house so they can get some work done.

I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt, based on my own style of determining trends, the number of people who want to dump Windows and go Linux, (“any brand, just get me something that works day to day”, of course I recommend SUSE) is increasing by a noticeable percentage.

I found a great article to help with all of this, perhaps I should print it out and hand it without ceremony to anyone approaching me with a “I’ve just had my LAST BSOD” gleam in their eye, it might save a lot of time.

Enjoy Serdar’s article “Three Steps to a Full Windows to Linux Migration“.

RossB

ZDnet’s Executive Editor David Berlind did a “technology shakedown” of MS Vista recently and discovered that when logged in as a “Standard” user, and Vista downloads and installs some patches/updates which requires a reboot, Vista will automatically go ahead and reboot you.  That is, it will reboot your machine whether you’re at a stopping point in your day/document/webconference or not.  In fact, it will show you the “Remind me later” button so you can delay the reboot — but it’s grayed out (as if to mock users)!!  YIKES!! David then found that by reconfiguring the workstation as an Administrator, he did indeed have the rights to delay the reboot.  Anyone else see a problem with this?

Am I being picky?  Am I just pointing this out to be mean?  No, not entirely… I was in a meeting today and we were discussing some of the security differences between Linux and Windows.  Part of Windows’ problem is that they have many applications and services which are granted “Administrative” priviledges in order to do their work.  These can then represent potential backdoors into the system for security. In addition, many organizations simply give users Administrative rights out-right which can lead to other complications.  Linux by comparison, does not automatically grant administrative rights to apps and processes.

So, to avoid running into this problem it would appear that you might need to deploy Vista and give users Administrative rights.  (Don’t worry, I’m sure users won’t do anything undesirable to their PCs…  ;-)   Alternatively, you could just force users to reboot whenever the OS feels it’s necessary and simply not give users any way to stop or delay it.  If you ask me, that’s quite the “rock” and the” hard place.”

I suspect MS might hear enough complaints about this “feature” from Vista users (as soon as they get enough of those, that is) and will issue some sort of patch or optional add-on which will resolve this for IT guys who care.  In the meantime, we’ll be waiting…

Okay, so perhaps the headline was a little sensational, but I was still very alarmed when I learned of this, and I think you should at least be aware of it.  Thus this post.  I guess that’s just one more (albeit relatively minor) reason to choose SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop instead.
What do you think?  Am I over-reacting?

A Vancouver B.C. law firm has overruled Microsoft Windows’ objection to being replaced with SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) 10. The firm’s IT manager, Richard Giroux says that level of downtime he’s seen in other firms is:

“Simply unacceptable.”

After testing a number of competitive desktop Linux distributions, Giroux chose SLED 10, citing it’s speed and included applications as a deciding factor in SUSE’s favor. To handle a number of problem or non-cross-platform applications the firm uses Citrix clients running on SLED, including it’s dictation and audio functions, along with Microsoft Office suite and other applications that primarily run on Microsoft Windows.

“Having an open environment with Linux gives us the opportunity to select from thousands of high-quality open source programs,”

One of the other features about SLED that Giroux likes is the subscription model, as it’s not categorized as a capital outlay expense, rather it’s an operational expense. The flat subscription costs are much more predictable for budgeting and the inclusion of many standard applications in SLED is an added plus.

“By nature, open source software has to integrate well with other applications, so we can implement them easily and cost-effectively. One application for transcription playback has already saved us thousands of dollars.”

As a final shot across Microsoft’s bows, Giroux cites his ability to do the entire office upgrade in a single weekend and the (conservative estimate) 20% maintenance savings effective immediately.

Read more about Whitelaw-Twining’s summary judgement in favor of Open Platform Solutions in the Novell Customer Showcase.

Enjoy,

RossB

Well, unfortunately I did not get to personally attend Linux World in San Francisco last week, but fortunately for me – there are tons of outlets for me to get details on what the buzz was all about last week. If any of you happened to be there, and have additional comments/insights to share, I’d love to see some comments posted…

SearchEnterpriseLinux’s Jack Loftus posted a blog entry which links to several other articles and interesting summaries… as good a place to start as any.

Then of course, there’s the official LinuxWorld 2007 conference website which has links to several major industry announcements and even promises to have videos of all the keynotes – although they aren’t posted quite yet.

If you’re interested in seeing some of Novell CEO Ron Hovsepian’s keynote where he discusses how we can accelerate adoption of Linux (in general), you can read a summary from Jack Loftus here, a summary from CNet here and watch the entire keynote via Flash here or even download Ron’s slides here. Personally, I think he did a good job of conveying the message (yes, I’m probably a bit biased, but I think his points are generally right on for enterprise Linux), and yes I truly think his points (if followed) would help Linux in general and SUSE.

Here’s a link to Novell’s press kit for Linux World – we had several exciting press announcements to share last week… definitely check these out!

You can also check out Novell CMO’s video blog entries from the Linux World show floor here and here.

Novell’s Russ Dastrup video guru also created a couple of videos for the show… here and here.

Finally, I’m one of those “visual” people… so I love multimedia. BIG THANKS to the folks at TechTargetTV for putting a series of videos together on YouTube which show some of the highlights/reflections of the conference. My favorite, has to be their video of the “Bag of Schwag” – pretty funny!

Our friends at Novell OpenAudio recently posted an interview with the folks at Codeweavers, who make a commercial version of Wine called Crossover Linux.  Crossover Linux and Wine enable users to run some Windows applications (such as MS Office, Internet Explorer, Outlook, and Quicken – among many others) on a Linux box.

According to this article from LinuxWorld.com, “Red Hat’s SMB desktop Linux delayed”, you will have to wait a while longer in order to get your hands on their product.  Originally announced in May, it’s expected this fall.  The desktop will have features such as a user-friendly interface based on Linux, run on “low-cost PCs” (for emerging markets), and legal versions of multimedia codecs built-in.

Well, you could wait until this ships later this year… OR…

If this type of product sounds useful to you, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 has been available since July 2006 and includes all of these features and a whole lot more! Why wait??

Addressing these specific feature points, however…

  • SLED has a UI that’s friendly to Windows users.  SLED’s user interface was designed with usability in mind. The UI had to be powerful, functional, and intuitive to users. We did lots of research, posted it at www.betterdesktop.org, and the result is our award winning (for example, here and here) desktop design. It also means easier adoption and less training for end users.
  • SLED runs on your existing PC and other “low-cost PCs”.  The minimum HW requirements are Pentium III, 256 MB RAM, and an 800 MB hard drive.  Only a tiny portion of the active PC population wouldn’t fit those requirements.  PLUS, it’s possible to run SLED on thin-client style hardware as well… which means even lower hardware requirements — and costs!
  • SLED includes legal multimedia codecs.  It has since it began shipping in July 2006. Some additional info is here and here.

Just some food for thought… as you’re sitting around waiting.  :-)

What is a Desktop?

When we think about a desktop, various things come to mind, a mini-tower machine sitting next to a monitor on your actual desktop, a set of applications running on an Operating System that you use to get things done, and (if you are me) either GNOME or KDE on a Linux System.

Will Google Do _____ ?

Rather all or any of the above come to mind when you heard Desktop, it’s important to note that there have also been long-standing rumors that someone like Google will be doing A) Google-branded Linux Distribution (Googlix, anyone?) B) Giving out free desktop machines with someone’s distribution on it all branded neatly with Google or C) Google somehow putting all the apps that one could ever need into the browser experience and taking over the Desktop market by neatly snaring everyone the moment they want to do something.

I’ve often wanted to know if there is a correlation between Google product announcements and the amount of people who experience severe heartburn at Microsoft’s various consumer-focused divisions. Perhaps a Google Maps mashup of the Seattle area and the sales of Pepcid AC at the local convenience stores would be informative….

The Community Gets Involved

Recently the GNOME developers were presented with the idea of an Online Desktop, not a “WebTop” where everything is run off the web, but something that could be a desktop replacement in every important way, you could boot off a Live CD/DVD or just get access to the web from any machine that can load a browser and supports open protocols.

This really opens up a lot of ideas, questions and suggestions, such as what if all we had to do was get to the web, and when we logged on to our “Online Desktop” we had access to an initial template desktop framework, and all sorts of good and useful plugins and addons were just a few clicks away? We already have this with tools like Flock, albeit in a browser context, or some of the flash-based online desktops such as Magix, DesktopTwo and Goowy.

Asking the Tough Questions

So the concept might look good, but some real questions need to be answered or considered for this to even begin to be useful:

Q) Will you be able to use any machine and browser that has broadband access to start and use the Online Desktop?

Q) Where will the data that you generate reside, who will back it up, and what happens if something needs to be restored?

Q) Will you have access to only the resources of the Online Desktop, or will you be able to use local machine resources too?

Q) Will there be P2V tools, or how do I get all my local data into the Online Desktop (Cloud), will there be tools or just HTTP uploads like Flickr/file attachments?

Q) Who is the real target market for the Online Desktop? Emerging Markets would seem to be one, but the very fact of it being an emerging market (low or no bandwidth available, extreme conditions, power issues, legacy or incompatible machines) makes that a tough sell.

Q) How about a disconnected mode? Does the very fact that I have a laptop and want to work on the plane or sitting in a deck chair next to the hotel pool mean that I would have a more complex arrangement than what I have now?

Q) How will apps have to be designed and to what specs must they adhere to be a part of the Online Desktop that we eventually get? Hopefully this will happen cross-vendor and cross-community, that way we get extreme interoperability, and not the impending Train Wreck that I see happening with Microsoft’s Windows Live scenario.

The REAL Question

Would you do it? Do you think the ultimate market is as a secure-protocol thin client that lets you access your corporate applications from literally any system in your or other environments? How much data (files, email, MP3′s etc.) do you treat as your “Daily Data Set” and would you ever trust a vendor or set of vendors to house that data, given that crackers/hackers will begin to try to get access to it?

Bottom Line

Is the concept of an Online Desktop the real goal, or would you rather have seamless data synchronization across all platforms and all flavors of operating systems?  Then would it really matter what you used?

Enjoy,

RossB

The manager of the Open Addict forums (a very popular site for Open Source and Free Software advocates and users) has implemented a block on all Internet Explorer users for compliance and maintenance reasons.

In his words:

“Well, believe it or not, most people coming to our site are using Windows and IE. This could hurt out traffic potentially, but I’m just fed up with IE rendering issues. So if you’re an IE user, I hope you’re not offended by any of this – it’s nothing against you as a user. Just please install and use Firefox or Opera if you use Windows. Better yet, use Linux and all of your dreams will come true.”

Wow, the shoe is definitely on the other foot now, maybe this will inspire other sites to “Just Say NO” to IE in all it’s forms. Get FireFox now, and join the revolution.

In a surprise move, and one that is probably timed for the beginning of back-to-school shopping, Walmart is about to begin selling a sub-$300 PC with a Via Processor, 1G of RAM, 80GB Hard Drive and a DVD Burner.  Oh, and OpenOffice.org 2.2 instead of something in a lovely shade of Microsoft Office.

This system doesn’t show on their site yet, it’s the Everex Impact GC3502 from the Everex Computer company, running Windows Vista Home and containing a surprising lack of trialware, according to Ars Technica contributor Eric Bangeman’s article.

Some would argue to that to be complete trialware/spyware and buggy-software free it should ship with a certain Gecko’s favorite version of Desktop Linux, and NOT Windows, but that’s another story and another time.  One bunch of proprietary spaghetti code at a time…

RossB

Lately Evans Data did a survey that found Microsoft’s Windows platform is losing market and mind share to the Linux platform. In a survey that encompassed over 400 IT people, including managers and developers, almost 13% of developers had fled to Linux and Open Source as their preferred platform for development, down from 74% in 2006 to just over 64% this year.

That isn’t the end of it, the number of Windows developers is expected to drop a further 2-3% by the end of the year.

The affection developers have for the Linux and Open Source platform has risen to by almost 35% year over year, from only 8% to nearly 12%. By the end of the year it’s expected to top 16%.

In a press release this week, Evans Data CEO John Andrews stated:

“If we look back over the 10 year trend we’ve been tracking on OS targeting, it’s clear that a shift away Windows began about two years ago, and the data show that this migration is now accelerating. Linux has benefited, but we also see corresponding growth in niche operating systems for non-traditional client devices. The landscape is changing.”

Oddly enough, no one from Microsoft was available to comment on the findings of this survey.

Highlights from the report include:

  • Javascript is the most widely used scripting language – with more than three times the users of PHP, Ruby, or Python, but use of Ruby is expected to increase by 50% within the coming year.
  • Though targeting is dropping, use of Windows on the development desktop remains steady.
  • A third of North American developers are currently working with virtualization, and 42.5% expect to be adopting this within the next year.

Enjoy,

RossB

You know what Samba is, right? For those of you who suddenly looked at the title of our blog to make sure you aren’t on the Strictly Ballroom fan site, I’m talking about Samba the Open Source CIFS server implementation. Samba has been around a while and does an excellent job of emulating a Windows system for File and Printer Sharing, WINS Server emulation, replacement of NT 4.0 Primary and Backup Domain Controllers and much more.

I ran across a very nicely done introduction to Samba the other day, something which should help explain the project and product,  how it’s installed and used, particularly to newcomers to this integration method.

Of course there is always the various documentation offerings about Samba either from standard publishing houses or from the community itself, take a good look at the following for a deeper view of Samba’s capabilities:

  • Samba.org - the official site for the Samba project
  • The Official Samba 3 HowTo and and Reference Guide – Like the Holy Bible for Samba, this has just about everything in it to really understand Samba, available in printed or online versions
  • Samba 3 By Example – John Terpstra’s excellent reference guide that walks you through every step of different scenarios for small, medium and large installations, literally a cookbook for getting Samba installed and running in almost any organization.
  • Using Samba – O’Reilly and Associates venerable tome that has been updated to include V3, this online/print book has been probably the most referenced Samba documentation source since the /usr/share/packages/samba files.
  • Samba.org Documentation pages - The most sources all in one spot for Samba, watch this page for new resources as they come available.
  • Samba.org Wiki – The official Wiki site for the Samba Project, get out there and contribute some words if you don’t code!

Enjoy,

RossB

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.